BatesLine

« Washington Post notices recall | Main | Tulsa's own free Wi-Fi website »

Oklahoma Supreme Court won't hear recall appeal

Today the Oklahoma Supreme Court declined to assume original jurisdiction in a case involving the recall of Tulsa City Councilors Jim Mautino and Chris Medlock.

Tulsans for Election Integrity v. City of Tulsa dealt with whether the City Clerk erred in not comparing the signatures on recall petitions to the signatures in the election board registration records as the Tulsa City Charter requires, and whether an affirmation by the Council of the City Clerk's finding on the sufficiency of petitions requires a majority vote of the full Council under the City Charter. District Judge Ronald Shaffer ruled for the City and against Tulsans for Election Integrity on April 28, and TfEI then appealed.

No word yet on whether the Court simply refused to hear the case or whether the Court actually touched on any of the legal matters in their opinion, which won't be available for a couple of days.

TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Oklahoma Supreme Court won't hear recall appeal:

» SUPREME COURT DECLINES TO ASSUME ORIGINAL JURISDICTION from HFFZ.org News
On Tuesday, May 31, 2005, the Oklahoma Supreme Court entered a two line order of the Court in Case No. 102,085, Tulsans for Election Integrity, et al. v. City of Tulsa, et al. declining, without explanation, to assume original jurisdiction... [Read More]

eXTReMe Tracker

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on May 31, 2005 10:23 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Washington Post notices recall.

The next post in this blog is Tulsa's own free Wi-Fi website.

For the latest entries, visit the main page, which also has links to archives by month and by category.

Contact

E-mail: blog AT batesline DOT com

BlogAds

Blog Ad Swap

Support BatesLine

Show your appreciation and help fund hosting and research expenses:

BatesLine is PayPal Verified