A friend e-mailed asking for comment on the Supreme Court's rulings on the two Ten Commandments cases before it.
Very well.
Were you really expecting coherent jurisprudence on religious expression in the public realm from this Court?
« City Comforts comment on Kelo | Main | Brian Crain to introduce eminent domain limits on local governments »
Supremes rule on Ten Commandments
TrackBack
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Supremes rule on Ten Commandments:
» Responses to the Supreme Court's Schizophrenic decisions from Danny Carlton (aka Jack Lewis)
Stephen M. Crampton, Chief Counsel American Family Association's Center for Law and Policy “The Court’s second-guessing of the hidden... [Read More]
About
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on June 27, 2005 5:54 PM.
The previous post in this blog was City Comforts comment on Kelo.
The next post in this blog is Brian Crain to introduce eminent domain limits on local governments.
For the latest entries, visit the main page, which also has links to archives by month and by category.
Contact
BlogAds
Blog Ad Swap
Support BatesLine
BatesLine is PayPal Verified
Recent Posts
- A succinct and well-linked rationale for voting no
- 4.0 frustration
- Sign suppression
- Both sides now
- Joel Kotkin on civic improvement schemes and city policy
- Steed on voter apathy and lobbyist power
- Upgrade in progress
- Elections are still a spectator sport in Delaware County
- Letters to the editor self-selection
- More bridges to nowhere
Search
Powered by
Movable Type Publishing Platform 4.0
Movable Type Publishing Platform 4.0
Comments (1)
Are they being removed from the courthouses so that those ruling in Eminent Domain cases (last week's ruling) won't have to look upon the 8th & 10th Commandments?
8) Thou shalt not steal.
10) Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house...
Posted by mad okie
|
June 27, 2005 9:45 PM
Posted on June 27, 2005 21:45