Tulsa election 2018: Campaign finance reports online, but most are delinquent

The City Clerk's office of the City of Tulsa has at long last begun publishing campaign contribution reports for City of Tulsa candidates on their website. In years past it was necessary to visit the City Clerk's office for physical copies of the reports; more recently they began providing them via email upon request. This is a great step forward for transparency.

For a few brief, shining years, candidates from large cities and counties had to file with the Oklahoma Ethics Commission, using the same online system as candidates for statewide and legislative office, but then some local officials convinced their cronies in the legislature to stop that aid to transparency. The current patchwork system is unnecessary. With a little more money for system capacity and administration, all political candidates at every level of government could use the Oklahoma Ethics Commission online system to file their reports, which would then be readily accessible for public scrutiny. (The system could use improvements -- direct permalinks to reports, the ability to download complete spreadsheets of contributions and expenditures for a campaign, incorporating all reports.)

What is surprising is how few candidates have bothered to comply with the requirement for pre-election reporting. State law requires a pre-election report to be filed by 5 p.m. on the second Monday before an election, i.e. 8 days prior. That deadline was Monday, August 20, 2018. The report is supposed to cover all contributions and expenditures through the third Monday before the election, i.e. 15 days prior. Supplemental reports have to be filed within 24 hours for any contribution or aggregate of contributions from a single source totalling $1,000 or more.

As of the time of this post, only four candidates have complied with state ethics law by filing a timely pre-election report: Jerry Goodwin (District 1), Kara Joy McKee (District 4), Connie Dodson (District 6), Dezaray Edwards (District 6). Fourteen of the 18 candidates who will be on Tuesday's ballot have not done so. While some of those candidates filed quarterly reports covering the period up through June 30, that leaves six weeks of activity unreported.

(It's also surprising to see that Tulsa's monopoly daily newspaper no longer takes an interest in candidate ethics reports. You can go to tulsaworld.com and learn which candidates classify the hot dog as a sandwich, but you won't be able to find out which candidates the anti-neighborhood, anti-historic preservation developers are backing.)

Happily, although it's difficult to find and a challenge to navigate, voters now have direct, unmediated access to City of Tulsa campaign contribution ethics reports.

What can be gleaned from this very incomplete set of reports?

TulsaBizPAC's sloppy August 1, 2018, report (the dates change from one page to the next, and the report covers a two-year period; it should be reporting quarterly) shows that it could be renamed HelmPAC. Developer Jay Helm of American Residential Group donated $10,000 of the $15,600 that was raised. Toyota dealer Jim Norton also gave $5,000. The remaining $600 came from Jayme Cox of Cimarex ($400), and local Cox Communications VP Roger Ramseyer ($200). On July 27, TulsaBizPAC gave $1,000 each to the following six candidates:

District 1: Jerry Goodwin
District 3: Crista Patrick
District 5: Cass Fahler
District 6: Connie Dodson, Dezeray Edwards
District 9: Ben Kimbro

I regard a donation from TulsaBizPAC (the political arm of the Tulsa Regional Chamber) as a strong counterindication. The Chamber's long-running role as a city contractor and their consistent lobbying for higher taxes suggests that they won't be backing fiscal conservatives.

The small coterie of cranky developers (Joe Westervelt and John Bumgarner are a couple of names to look for in this regard) who have blocked sensible zoning reforms (ideas like form-based codes and neighborhood conservation districts that would customize the rules to meet the needs of individual neighborhoods) are heavily backing Crista Patrick, daughter of longtime, off-and-on Councilor David Patrick. Westervelt and Bumgarner gave her $500 each, as did Art Couch of W. N. Couch Construction, a frequent contractor to the city for street construction. Burt Holmes, who targeted independent-minded, grassroots councilors for defeat in the 2011 election, has given Crista Patrick the maximum, $2,700. Patrick also has backing from George Kaiser's circles: $250 each from Ruth Kaiser Nelson (George's sister) and Frederic Dorwart (president and trustee of GKFF). Former mayor Kathy Taylor gave Patrick $100. For 20 years, Money Belt donors have looked to David Patrick to serve their interests (and not the interests of his District 3 constituents) at City Hall. It looks like those same interests expect Crista Patrick to follow in her father's footsteps.

In District 4, the big developer money is backing Daniel Regan. $2,000 from Jay Helm, $5,000 from Associated General Contractors Oklahoma PAC, $2,700 from Robert Stem, executive director of Association of Oklahoma General Contractors (road building association). In the 2nd Quarter report, Regan got $500 from John Bumgarner and $250 from Kathy Taylor. Bumgarner is the un-developer of the vacant half-block south of the Broken Arrow Expressway between Troost and Utica Avenues.

In District 6, Connie Dodson received $1,000 from the Realtors PAC in Oklahoma City (which should have filed an ethics report of its own with the City Clerk's offce), in addition to the $1,000 from TulsaBizPAC.